Wikipedia admins used their editorial power to censor any mention of the name “Eric Ciaramella” after it became widely publicized (initially by RealClearInvestigations) that he was the alleged Trump-Ukraine “whistleblower.” The methods of suppression included:
- blocking edits that attempted to add “Eric Ciaramella” to Wikipedia’s Whistleblower page and classifying them as “vandalism”
- blocking edits that attempted to add “Eric Ciaramella” to Wikipedia’s Trump-Ukraine controversy page and classifying them as: “grossly insulting, degrading, or offensive material” and “serious [Biographies of Living Persons] vioations”
- blocking draft pages about Eric Ciarmella and classifying them as “attack pages”
- implementing a filter to further prevent future mentions of the alleged “whistleblower’s” name
- banning editors who challenged the above actions taken by admins
- threatening to ban editors who violated the above preventative measures
A former Wikipedia editor, who writes under the alias T.D. Adler, wrote a very thorough piece for Breitbart covering this censorship in which he highlighted how the Wikipedia admins even claimed there was a lack of “reliable” sources covering the story, despite that not being true:
Left-wing editors argued against including Ciaramella’s name over a lack of “reliable sources” mentioning it. Sources such as RealClearInvestigations and others were cited, but editors often dismiss conservative sources as “unreliable” on Wikipedia. […] However, sources considered reliable on Wikipedia, the Dallas Morning News and Ukrainian state-owned UNIAN, also reported the alleged whistleblower’s name.